Googletest export

docs/_data/navigation.yml

@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ nav:
     url: "/gmock_cheat_sheet.html"
 - section: "References"
   items:
+  - title: "Assertions"
+    url: "/reference/assertions.html"
   - title: "Matchers"
     url: "/reference/matchers.html"
   - title: "Actions"

docs/faq.md

@@ -279,8 +279,9 @@ disabled by our build system. Please see more details
 ## My death test hangs (or seg-faults). How do I fix it?
 
 In googletest, death tests are run in a child process and the way they work is
-delicate. To write death tests you really need to understand how they work.
-Please make sure you have read [this](advanced.md#how-it-works).
+delicate. To write death tests you really need to understand how they work—see
+the details at [Death Assertions](reference/assertions.md#death) in the
+Assertions Reference.
 
 In particular, death tests don't like having multiple threads in the parent
 process. So the first thing you can try is to eliminate creating threads outside
@@ -353,72 +354,8 @@ You may still want to use `SetUp()/TearDown()` in the following cases:
 
 ## The compiler complains "no matching function to call" when I use ASSERT_PRED*. How do I fix it?
 
-If the predicate function you use in `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*` is
-overloaded or a template, the compiler will have trouble figuring out which
-overloaded version it should use. `ASSERT_PRED_FORMAT*` and
-`EXPECT_PRED_FORMAT*` don't have this problem.
-
-If you see this error, you might want to switch to
-`(ASSERT|EXPECT)_PRED_FORMAT*`, which will also give you a better failure
-message. If, however, that is not an option, you can resolve the problem by
-explicitly telling the compiler which version to pick.
-
-For example, suppose you have
-
-```c++
-bool IsPositive(int n) {
-  return n > 0;
-}
-
-bool IsPositive(double x) {
-  return x > 0;
-}
-```
-
-you will get a compiler error if you write
-
-```c++
-EXPECT_PRED1(IsPositive, 5);
-```
-
-However, this will work:
-
-```c++
-EXPECT_PRED1(static_cast<bool (*)(int)>(IsPositive), 5);
-```
-
-(The stuff inside the angled brackets for the `static_cast` operator is the type
-of the function pointer for the `int`-version of `IsPositive()`.)
-
-As another example, when you have a template function
-
-```c++
-template <typename T>
-bool IsNegative(T x) {
-  return x < 0;
-}
-```
-
-you can use it in a predicate assertion like this:
-
-```c++
-ASSERT_PRED1(IsNegative<int>, -5);
-```
-
-Things are more interesting if your template has more than one parameter. The
-following won't compile:
-
-```c++
-ASSERT_PRED2(GreaterThan<int, int>, 5, 0);
-```
-
-as the C++ pre-processor thinks you are giving `ASSERT_PRED2` 4 arguments, which
-is one more than expected. The workaround is to wrap the predicate function in
-parentheses:
-
-```c++
-ASSERT_PRED2((GreaterThan<int, int>), 5, 0);
-```
+See details for [`EXPECT_PRED*`](reference/assertions.md#EXPECT_PRED) in the
+Assertions Reference.
 
 ## My compiler complains about "ignoring return value" when I call RUN_ALL_TESTS(). Why?
 

docs/gmock_cook_book.md

@@ -1137,51 +1137,8 @@ Matches(AllOf(Ge(0), Le(100), Ne(50)))
 
 ### Using Matchers in googletest Assertions
 
-Since matchers are basically predicates that also know how to describe
-themselves, there is a way to take advantage of them in googletest assertions.
-It's called `ASSERT_THAT` and `EXPECT_THAT`:
-
-```cpp
-  ASSERT_THAT(value, matcher);  // Asserts that value matches matcher.
-  EXPECT_THAT(value, matcher);  // The non-fatal version.
-```
-
-For example, in a googletest test you can write:
-
-```cpp
-#include "gmock/gmock.h"
-
-using ::testing::AllOf;
-using ::testing::Ge;
-using ::testing::Le;
-using ::testing::MatchesRegex;
-using ::testing::StartsWith;
-
-...
-  EXPECT_THAT(Foo(), StartsWith("Hello"));
-  EXPECT_THAT(Bar(), MatchesRegex("Line \\d+"));
-  ASSERT_THAT(Baz(), AllOf(Ge(5), Le(10)));
-```
-
-which (as you can probably guess) executes `Foo()`, `Bar()`, and `Baz()`, and
-verifies that:
-
-*   `Foo()` returns a string that starts with `"Hello"`.
-*   `Bar()` returns a string that matches regular expression `"Line \\d+"`.
-*   `Baz()` returns a number in the range [5, 10].
-
-The nice thing about these macros is that *they read like English*. They
-generate informative messages too. For example, if the first `EXPECT_THAT()`
-above fails, the message will be something like:
-
-```cpp
-Value of: Foo()
-  Actual: "Hi, world!"
-Expected: starts with "Hello"
-```
-
-**Credit:** The idea of `(ASSERT|EXPECT)_THAT` was borrowed from Joe Walnes'
-Hamcrest project, which adds `assertThat()` to JUnit.
+See [`EXPECT_THAT`](reference/assertions.md#EXPECT_THAT) in the Assertions
+Reference.
 
 ### Using Predicates as Matchers
 

docs/primer.md

@@ -118,7 +118,10 @@ Depending on the nature of the leak, it may or may not be worth fixing - so keep
 this in mind if you get a heap checker error in addition to assertion errors.
 
 To provide a custom failure message, simply stream it into the macro using the
-`<<` operator or a sequence of such operators. An example:
+`<<` operator or a sequence of such operators. See the following example, using
+the
+[`ASSERT_EQ` and `EXPECT_EQ`](reference/assertions.md?cl=374325853#EXPECT_EQ)
+macros to verify value equality:
 
 ```c++
 ASSERT_EQ(x.size(), y.size()) << "Vectors x and y are of unequal length";
@@ -133,110 +136,12 @@ macro--in particular, C strings and `string` objects. If a wide string
 (`wchar_t*`, `TCHAR*` in `UNICODE` mode on Windows, or `std::wstring`) is
 streamed to an assertion, it will be translated to UTF-8 when printed.
 
-### Basic Assertions
-
-These assertions do basic true/false condition testing.
-
-Fatal assertion            | Nonfatal assertion         | Verifies
--------------------------- | -------------------------- | --------------------
-`ASSERT_TRUE(condition);`  | `EXPECT_TRUE(condition);`  | `condition` is true
-`ASSERT_FALSE(condition);` | `EXPECT_FALSE(condition);` | `condition` is false
-
-Remember, when they fail, `ASSERT_*` yields a fatal failure and returns from the
-current function, while `EXPECT_*` yields a nonfatal failure, allowing the
-function to continue running. In either case, an assertion failure means its
-containing test fails.
-
-**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
-
-### Binary Comparison
-
-This section describes assertions that compare two values.
-
-Fatal assertion          | Nonfatal assertion       | Verifies
------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------------
-`ASSERT_EQ(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_EQ(val1, val2);` | `val1 == val2`
-`ASSERT_NE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_NE(val1, val2);` | `val1 != val2`
-`ASSERT_LT(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_LT(val1, val2);` | `val1 < val2`
-`ASSERT_LE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_LE(val1, val2);` | `val1 <= val2`
-`ASSERT_GT(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_GT(val1, val2);` | `val1 > val2`
-`ASSERT_GE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_GE(val1, val2);` | `val1 >= val2`
-
-Value arguments must be comparable by the assertion's comparison operator or
-you'll get a compiler error. We used to require the arguments to support the
-`<<` operator for streaming to an `ostream`, but this is no longer necessary. If
-`<<` is supported, it will be called to print the arguments when the assertion
-fails; otherwise googletest will attempt to print them in the best way it can.
-For more details and how to customize the printing of the arguments, see the
-[documentation](./advanced.md#teaching-googletest-how-to-print-your-values).
-
-These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the
-corresponding comparison operator (e.g., `==` or `<`). Since this is discouraged
-by the Google
-[C++ Style Guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Operator_Overloading),
-you may need to use `ASSERT_TRUE()` or `EXPECT_TRUE()` to assert the equality of
-two objects of a user-defined type.
-
-However, when possible, `ASSERT_EQ(actual, expected)` is preferred to
-`ASSERT_TRUE(actual == expected)`, since it tells you `actual` and `expected`'s
-values on failure.
-
-Arguments are always evaluated exactly once. Therefore, it's OK for the
-arguments to have side effects. However, as with any ordinary C/C++ function,
-the arguments' evaluation order is undefined (i.e., the compiler is free to
-choose any order), and your code should not depend on any particular argument
-evaluation order.
-
-`ASSERT_EQ()` does pointer equality on pointers. If used on two C strings, it
-tests if they are in the same memory location, not if they have the same value.
-Therefore, if you want to compare C strings (e.g. `const char*`) by value, use
-`ASSERT_STREQ()`, which will be described later on. In particular, to assert
-that a C string is `NULL`, use `ASSERT_STREQ(c_string, NULL)`. Consider using
-`ASSERT_EQ(c_string, nullptr)` if c++11 is supported. To compare two `string`
-objects, you should use `ASSERT_EQ`.
-
-When doing pointer comparisons use `*_EQ(ptr, nullptr)` and `*_NE(ptr, nullptr)`
-instead of `*_EQ(ptr, NULL)` and `*_NE(ptr, NULL)`. This is because `nullptr` is
-typed, while `NULL` is not. See the [FAQ](faq.md) for more details.
-
-If you're working with floating point numbers, you may want to use the floating
-point variations of some of these macros in order to avoid problems caused by
-rounding. See [Advanced googletest Topics](advanced.md) for details.
-
-Macros in this section work with both narrow and wide string objects (`string`
-and `wstring`).
-
-**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
-
-**Historical note**: Before February 2016 `*_EQ` had a convention of calling it
-as `ASSERT_EQ(expected, actual)`, so lots of existing code uses this order. Now
-`*_EQ` treats both parameters in the same way.
-
-### String Comparison
-
-The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare
-two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead.
-
-
-| Fatal assertion                | Nonfatal assertion             | Verifies                                                 |
-| --------------------------     | ------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------- |
-| `ASSERT_STREQ(str1,str2);`     | `EXPECT_STREQ(str1,str2);`     | the two C strings have the same content   		     |
-| `ASSERT_STRNE(str1,str2);`     | `EXPECT_STRNE(str1,str2);`     | the two C strings have different contents 		     |
-| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(str1,str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(str1,str2);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case   |
-| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(str1,str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASENE(str1,str2);` | the two C strings have different contents, ignoring case |
-
-
-Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. A `NULL`
-pointer and an empty string are considered *different*.
-
-`*STREQ*` and `*STRNE*` also accept wide C strings (`wchar_t*`). If a comparison
-of two wide strings fails, their values will be printed as UTF-8 narrow strings.
-
-**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
-
-**See also**: For more string comparison tricks (substring, prefix, suffix, and
-regular expression matching, for example), see [this](advanced.md) in the
-Advanced googletest Guide.
+GoogleTest provides a collection of assertions for verifying the behavior of
+your code in various ways. You can check Boolean conditions, compare values
+based on relational operators, verify string values, floating-point values, and
+much more. There are even assertions that enable you to verify more complex
+states by providing custom predicates. For the complete list of assertions
+provided by GoogleTest, see the [Assertions Reference](reference/assertions.md).
 
 ## Simple Tests
 

docs/reference/matchers.md

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ will be changed.
 `IsTrue` and `IsFalse` are useful when you need to use a matcher, or for types
 that can be explicitly converted to Boolean, but are not implicitly converted to
 Boolean. In other cases, you can use the basic
-[`EXPECT_TRUE` and `EXPECT_FALSE`](../primer.md#basic-assertions) assertions.
+[`EXPECT_TRUE` and `EXPECT_FALSE`](assertions.md#boolean) assertions.
 
 ## Floating-Point Matchers {#FpMatchers}