- 02 May, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Dominic Hamon authored
-
git://github.com/biojppm/benchmarkDominic Hamon authored
Merge branch 'test_usercounters' of git://github.com/biojppm/benchmark into biojppm-test_usercounters
-
Felix Duvallet authored
This prevents errors when additional non-timing data are present in the JSON that is loaded, for example when complexity data has been computed (see #379).
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
[ci-skip]
-
- 01 May, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
- 29 Apr, 2017 19 commits
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
- Epsilon is now understood as relative to expected value. - Improve error messages for epsilon checks.
-
- 28 Apr, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
This is needed for examining the values of user counters (needed for #348). It is also needed for checking the values of standard benchmark results like items_processed or complexities (for example, checking the standard deviation is needed for unit testing #357 as discussed in #362).
-
- 27 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
The tests are still missing a way to check actual validity of numerical results; this will be done next. As they currently are, the tests pass, but the problem detected with #378 is still standing and the results with non-standard counters are wrong.
-