- 02 May, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
[ci-skip]
-
- 01 May, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
- 29 Apr, 2017 19 commits
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
- Epsilon is now understood as relative to expected value. - Improve error messages for epsilon checks.
-
- 28 Apr, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
This is needed for examining the values of user counters (needed for #348). It is also needed for checking the values of standard benchmark results like items_processed or complexities (for example, checking the standard deviation is needed for unit testing #357 as discussed in #362).
-
- 27 Apr, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
The tests are still missing a way to check actual validity of numerical results; this will be done next. As they currently are, the tests pass, but the problem detected with #378 is still standing and the results with non-standard counters are wrong.
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
-
vladoovt authored
Fixes #378 coercion to double was causing counter to forget its flags, changed it so that its value is updated directly
-
Joao Paulo Magalhaes authored
The problem was that the call to Finish() the user counters was lost in a big merge. If I had already written the tests for the user counters, this would probably have been catched earlier.
-