Commit 130382f2 by Anthony VH

Remove comment about GCC commit which didn't really relate to the code.

parent 848927ae
...@@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ struct conjunction<B1, Bn...> ...@@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ struct conjunction<B1, Bn...>
// Reimplementation of is_constructible and is_default_constructible, due to them being broken for // Reimplementation of is_constructible and is_default_constructible, due to them being broken for
// std::pair and std::tuple until LWG 2367 fix (see https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2367). // std::pair and std::tuple until LWG 2367 fix (see https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2367).
// This causes compile errors in e.g. clang 3.5 or gcc 4.9. // This causes compile errors in e.g. clang 3.5 or gcc 4.9.
// Based on commit fixing this in gcc: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/d3c64041b32b6962ad6b2d879231537a477631fb
template <typename T> template <typename T>
struct is_default_constructible : std::is_default_constructible<T> {}; struct is_default_constructible : std::is_default_constructible<T> {};
......
...@@ -3196,7 +3196,6 @@ struct conjunction<B1, Bn...> ...@@ -3196,7 +3196,6 @@ struct conjunction<B1, Bn...>
// Reimplementation of is_constructible and is_default_constructible, due to them being broken for // Reimplementation of is_constructible and is_default_constructible, due to them being broken for
// std::pair and std::tuple until LWG 2367 fix (see https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2367). // std::pair and std::tuple until LWG 2367 fix (see https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2367).
// This causes compile errors in e.g. clang 3.5 or gcc 4.9. // This causes compile errors in e.g. clang 3.5 or gcc 4.9.
// Based on commit fixing this in gcc: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/d3c64041b32b6962ad6b2d879231537a477631fb
template <typename T> template <typename T>
struct is_default_constructible : std::is_default_constructible<T> {}; struct is_default_constructible : std::is_default_constructible<T> {};
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment