1. 19 Nov, 2009 4 commits
  2. 17 Nov, 2009 9 commits
  3. 13 Nov, 2009 12 commits
  4. 12 Nov, 2009 3 commits
  5. 11 Nov, 2009 1 commit
  6. 09 Nov, 2009 1 commit
  7. 04 Nov, 2009 2 commits
    • lxc: lxc version to reflect string in AC_INIT (V2) · d5cf4386
      Michel Normand authored
      I changed the code to have lxc version to reflect the
      string set in AC_INIT of configure.ac
      rather than to report only the 3 first digits
      
      update: use PACKAGE_VERSION in place of VERSION
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarMichel Normand <normand@fr.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarDaniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
    • configure.ac - allow user to switch off/on documentation generation · 5c8f9bd8
      Andrian Nord authored
      Andrian Nord <NightNord@gmail.com>:
      >> > > As documentation requires docbook2man to be installed, which is not,
      >> > > otherwise, required for proper LXC work or compilation process, it
      >> > > might be usefull to be able to switch it off.
      
      Michel Normand <normand@fr.ibm.com>:
      > > For me, it is Ok to add a --enable/disable/-doc,
      > > but not make configure to fail if no option specified
      > > and no docbook2man package.
      > > 
      > > For me it should be optionnal.
      > > I like the current behaviour where configure is running without option
      > > and is enabling/disabling by itself the doc building.
      > > Could you send a new patch with this idea ?
      
      Andrian Nord <NightNord@gmail.com>:
      Of course. You mean, that you what default behaviour to remain
      auto-detection? That is:
      --enable-doc: require docbook2man or fail, generate mans
      --enable-doc=auto, or not specified (default): check for docbook2man,
      generate mans if found, silently ignore if not found (I suppose
      diagnostic message is redundant, as information already contains into
      ./configure --help)
      --disable-doc: never check for docbook2man and don't gen mans
      
      Here comes a patch what do this, as far as I see
      (I'm sorry for violating post-rules in previous mail, now I'll do all
      right, I hope. Should I attach patch anyway, as it might be usefull
      for applying?)
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarAndrian Nord <NightNord@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: 's avatarMichel Normand <normand@fr.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: 's avatarDaniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
  8. 03 Nov, 2009 1 commit
  9. 23 Oct, 2009 1 commit
  10. 22 Oct, 2009 3 commits
  11. 15 Oct, 2009 1 commit
  12. 12 Oct, 2009 2 commits